Since that compiler is not even the last in the 3.3.x series, and there are now three later (released) gcc series, I think we have to write that off to an optimization bug in gcc 3.3.x.

On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote:

Peter Dalgaard wrote:

I don't see it with a current version either. What happens if you
reduce the optimization level? (I've tried both "-g" and -g "-O3").
Is that -std=gnu99 bit necessary?

(No, but it helps get fast C99 functions from the OS rather than slow substitutes.)

My gcc is gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13).

I've now tried with ./configure CFLAGS="-g [-O|-O2|-O3] [-std=gnu99]",
i.e. with every combination from "-g" to "-g -O3 -std=gnu99".  The
error occured if and only if -O2 or -O3 was used.



--
Brian D. Ripley,                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to