Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > Quite a while back we set the goal of running R in 16Mb RAM, as people (I > think Kjetil) had teaching labs that small.
It's a while since I actually har R used on such small machines, I think 64 MB is quite acceptable now. Kjetil > > Since then R has grown, and we has recently started to optimize R for > speed rather than size. I recently tested R-devel on my ancient Win98 > notebook with 64Mb RAM -- it ran but startup was rather slow on what I > think is a 233MHz processor and very slow disc. > > R still runs in 16Mb, but that is getting tight. Does anyone have any > need to run on a smaller machine than my 64Mb notebook? > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
