On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Tony Plate wrote:
>
> That's what I was trying to say: the whole truth is that numeric index
> vectors that contain positive integral quantities can also contain
> zeros. Upon rereading this passage yet again, I think it is more
> misleading than merely incomplete: the phrasings "positive integral
> quantities", and "*must* lie in the set ..." rule out the possibility of
> the vector containing zeros.
>
"Someone told me that you can't run without bouncing the ball in
basketball. I got a basketball and tried it and it worked fine. He must be
wrong" -- a comp.lang.c standard
It doesn't rule out the the possibility of the vector containing zeros, it
tells you that you should not put zeros in the vector.
-thomas
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
