Dear Peter and Brian,
I have made progress. I removed libf2c and installed it again. Then
libg2c.so.0 ended up in /usr/lib64. make is getting much further now. I think
I had a messed up installation of the development packages, maybe. Weird.
Anyway, I appreciate all your great help.
Cheers,
Dick
*******************************************************************************
Richard P. Beyer, Ph.D. University of Washington
Tel.:(206) 616 7378 Env. & Occ. Health Sci. , Box 354695
Fax: (206) 685 4696 4225 Roosevelt Way NE, # 100
Seattle, WA 98105-6099
http://depts.washington.edu/ceeh/ServiceCores/FC5/FC5.html
http://staff.washington.edu/~dbeyer
*******************************************************************************
On 26 Oct 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Dick Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Thanks very much for your help.
>>
>> I did a up2date libf2c, and see that I already had libf2c on my system:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.4.4]# rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/libg2c.so.0
>> libf2c-3.4.4-2
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.4.4]# rpm -q --filesbypkg libf2c-3.4.4-2
>> libf2c /usr/lib/libg2c.so.0 libf2c
>> /usr/lib/libg2c.so.0.0.0
>>
>> Is there something I haven't done with config.site or some Make* file
>> so make will not get libg2c.a instead of libg2c.so.0.0.0?
>
> Hmm, pretty odd if the linker doesn't pick up .so files in /usr/lib.
>
> It's a bit of a longshot, but is it registered in the dynamic
> linker cache? As in
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /sbin/ldconfig -p | grep g2c
> libg2c.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libg2c.so.0
>
>
> --
> O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
> c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
> (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
> ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907
>
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
