On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:33:50PM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote:
> Proper R bug reports provide short "cut & paste" executable
> example code {i.e. no prompt, no output} or at least the
> transcript of such code {transcript : input (+ prompt) + output}.
My patch includes the function dtk.test.brace.names() which
demonstrates the problem. If you source just that function into a
completely stock R, you can see the losing names problem by running:
dtk.test.brace.names(return.results.p=T ,only="all")
To make it easier to see just what the problem is, I'll send example
output in my next email.
> Also your script is for R and S-plus and at least in some places
> it seems you think R has a bug because it behaves differently
> than S or S-plus.
No, I don't think that. If comments in my code give that impression
then that's a bug in my comments, it was not my intention.
My coworkers and I originally fixed the name losing problem in S-Plus,
then later did so in R, so in some places I might have sloppily said,
"R is different than S-Plus" when what I REALLY meant was, "Stock R is
different than our fixed/patched S-Plus where we've already solved
these name-losing problems."
Stock S-Plus and R both suffer from losing names when they shouldn't.
Since I use both dialects, I've included (ugly) fixes for both. Of
course you probably only care about the R part, but I didn't think it
would hurt to include both.
> Now I'm sure you know from the R-FAQ that there are quite a few
> intentional differences between the two dialects of S,
Yes, I'm aware of that FAQ. I also just finished porting a large body
of code from S-Plus to R a few months ago, so I have a very concrete
appreciation of the MANY little S-Plus vs. R differences, many more
than are mentioned in that FAQ.
Some of those differences are simply arbitrary or accidental, but
others are places where S-Plus was basically doing something dumb and
the R behavior is better. I have no complaints about this. :)
(The converse, where R's behavior is definitely inferior to that of
S-Plus, seems to be a lot less common, and are usually more minor.)
--
Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.piskorski.com/
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
