On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Seth Falcon wrote:
> For what its worth, I don't like this idea of adding a ChangeLog field
> to the DESCRIPTION file.
>
> Agreeing upon a standard location for NEWS or CHANGES or some such
> seems a more simple solution. As long as the presence of such a file
> is *optional*. And if the location really needs to be at the top,
> then the build tools could grab it from there as they do the
> DESCRIPTION file.
We're certainly agreed on its being optional.
-thomas
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
