On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
>
> >> It is equivalent to 'evalq' except the its default
>
> It would be easier to deal with thes reports if in future you
> could provide a patch against the source file (here eval.Rd).
I normally download a copy of the current binary and the
matching source distribution for performing searches, so
would not be tracking r-devel or r-patched updates.
Would the following have been palatable as annotated?
R-2.1.1/src/library/base/man/eval.Rd:
59c59
< equivalent to \code{evalq} except that its default argument creates a
---
> equivalent to \code{evalq} except the its default argument creates a
----------------------------------------------------------
SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
