On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:50:54AM -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > >Did you compile R without optimization? Such reads are often the result > >of read-aheads produced by the optimizer in an attempt to keep > >pipelines full (and are harmless). > > There were both a read and a write. I can see the read being harmless, > but is the write harmless? I suspect this may be the bug I fixed on > July 16, since it had to do with character classes including ranges > (like Charlie's "[a-pr-z]"). > > Charlie, have you tried a recent version of R-patched?
Now I have. The computer is my laptop and not connected to the net so I can't upload details, but R-1.2.1-patched as of yesterday does NOT exhibit the same bug. So I guess you are right. Sorry for wasting your time. I'm still a newbie at this R stuff. Next time I'll check against R-*-patched before submitting a bug report. -- Charles Geyer Professor, School of Statistics University of Minnesota [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
