Why is this "held for document update"? This is an actual editorial errata that happened during the final RPC editing phase and the authors didn't catch. This just simply be verified.
On 09.04.26, 21:09, "RFC Errata System" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC9312, "Manageability of the QUIC Transport Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8870 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8870> -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Ike Kunze <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Date Reported: 2026-04-07 Held by: G Fairhurst (IESG) Section: 3.8 Original Text ------------- The round-trip time (RTT) of QUIC flows can be inferred by observation once per flow during the handshake in passive TCP measurement; Corrected Text -------------- The round-trip time (RTT) of QUIC flows can be inferred by observation once per flow during the handshake, as in passive TCP measurement; Notes ----- The "as" got dropped from -18 to RFC9312. The earlier wording is clearer because it refers to passive TCP measurement only as an analogy, avoiding the incorrect implication that QUIC RTT inference involves TCP. -------------------------------------- RFC9312 (draft-ietf-quic-manageability-18) -------------------------------------- Title : Manageability of the QUIC Transport Protocol Publication Date : September 2022 Author(s) : M. Kühlewind, B. Trammell Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : QUIC Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
