Thanks Ike for finding and reporting!

I agree that this errata must have happened during final editing and should be 
verified.



On 07.04.26, 15:27, "RFC Errata System" <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9312,
"Manageability of the QUIC Transport Protocol".


--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8870 
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8870>


--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Ike Kunze <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>


Section: 3.8


Original Text
-------------
The round-trip time (RTT) of QUIC flows can be inferred by
observation once per flow during the handshake in passive TCP
measurement;


Corrected Text
--------------
The round-trip time (RTT) of QUIC flows can be inferred by
observation once per flow during the handshake, as in passive TCP
measurement;


Notes
-----
The "as" got dropped from -18 to RFC9312.
The earlier wording is clearer because it refers to passive TCP measurement 
only as an analogy, avoiding the incorrect implication that QUIC RTT inference 
involves TCP.


Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.


--------------------------------------
RFC9312 (draft-ietf-quic-manageability-18)
--------------------------------------
Title : Manageability of the QUIC Transport Protocol
Publication Date : September 2022
Author(s) : M. Kühlewind, B. Trammell
Category : INFORMATIONAL
Source : QUIC
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG



Reply via email to