Hi folks,

Thanks for the responses on the list and GitHub.

To close the loop here, the chairs have determined there is consensus to 
proceed with the proposed outcomes. 

We note that the two-layer encoding topic raised the most discussion with 
varying opinion but on balance the rough consensus leans on the side of making 
this change. 

We are early in the document lifetime, decision choices made now can be 
revisited if the bar of supporting evidence is met. Cutting a new draft based 
on the first tranche of WG feedback allows folks to implement, interop and 
bring back data to the group to help us make informed choices.

Cheers,
Lucas & Matt
QUIC WG Chairs

On Fri, Mar 20, 2026, at 08:18, Lucas Pardue wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> At the 125 session, Kazuho presented several QMux open issues with associated 
> PRs. This email serves to summarize the outcome of the discussion and confirm 
> the feeling in the room on the list. 
> 
> Since there has seemed to be strong emerging consensus on GitHub and in the 
> room, the authors would like to promptly follow up on the outcomes. If you 
> disagree with them, please let that be known ASAP and before 2026-03-26, 
> ideally on the issue or PR itself.
> 
> As noted in the session, we'd like to schedule a virtual interim for QMux 
> before IETF 126, targetting an EMEA friendly timeslot. Look out for a follow 
> up email on that topic, in the meantime you can express your interest 
> directly to the chairs.
> 
>  • Two-layer encoding
>    • Issues: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/21 and 
> https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/24
>    • PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/26
>    • Outcome: merge the PR to close the issues
>  • Deadlock and flow control
>    • Issue: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/9
>    • PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/27
>    • Outcome: merge the PR to close the issue
>  • TLS Profile - negotiating application protocol when using TLS
>    • Issues: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/12 and 
> https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/25
>    • PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/33
>    • Outcome: merge the PR to close the issue
>  • TLS Profile - QMux transport params (TPs) in TLS handshake
>    • Issue: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/18
>    • PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/28
>    • Outcome: merge the PR and close the issue (the PR adds improved text but 
> we will keep TPs in QMux frames
>  • Implicit acks & ping
>    • Issue: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/22
>    • PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/23
>    • Outcome: merge the PR to close the issue
>  • Multipath TCP
>    • Issue: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/5
>    • PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/29
>    • Outcome: do not merge the PR, close with no action
> Cheers,
> Lucas & Matt
> QUIC WG Chairs

Reply via email to