Thanks for the progress and I apologize for missing the session.  I tried
to provide helpful reviews where possible.

The two-layer encoding Issue is the only one where I felt we were going in
the wrong direction, but I recognize I might not fully understand the
issues.

Thanks, Ian

On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 4:21 AM Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> At the 125 session, Kazuho presented several QMux open issues with
> associated PRs. This email serves to summarize the outcome of the
> discussion and confirm the feeling in the room on the list.
>
> Since there has seemed to be strong emerging consensus on GitHub and in
> the room, the authors would like to promptly follow up on the outcomes. If
> you disagree with them, please let that be known ASAP and before
> 2026-03-26, ideally on the issue or PR itself.
>
> As noted in the session, we'd like to schedule a virtual interim for QMux
> before IETF 126, targetting an EMEA friendly timeslot. Look out for a
> follow up email on that topic, in the meantime you can express your
> interest directly to the chairs.
>
>
>    - Two-layer encoding
>       - Issues: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/21 and
>       https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/24
>       - PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/26
>       - Outcome: merge the PR to close the issues
>    - Deadlock and flow control
>       - Issue: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/9
>       - PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/27
>       - Outcome: merge the PR to close the issue
>    - TLS Profile - negotiating application protocol when using TLS
>       - Issues: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/12 and
>       https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/25
>       - PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/33
>       - Outcome: merge the PR to close the issue
>    - TLS Profile - QMux transport params (TPs) in TLS handshake
>       - Issue: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/18
>       - PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/28
>       - Outcome: merge the PR and close the issue (the PR adds improved
>       text but we will keep TPs in QMux frames
>    - Implicit acks & ping
>       - Issue: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/22
>       - PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/23
>       - Outcome: merge the PR to close the issue
>    - Multipath TCP
>       - Issue: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/issues/5
>       - PR: https://github.com/quicwg/qmux/pull/29
>       - Outcome: do not merge the PR, close with no action
>
> Cheers,
> Lucas & Matt
> QUIC WG Chairs
>

Reply via email to