Hi Ted, On Tue, Jul 30, 2024, at 10:15, Ted Hardie wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > I think I am missing something fundamental here: > > I'd like to propose that we migrate away from using GitHub wikis for all > repositories in the quicwg org, towards using the quicwg.org pages. This is > intended to improve the contribution and change process. It is hoped that > this will also improve the discoverability of content on the wiki. During any > migration, content will continue to reside on the wiki. > > There is nothing on those pages that I could see that indicates how you can > propose a change to the pages. If the aim here is to enable "useful grass > roots contribution and maintenance.", I think it would be appropriate to say > more about how this migration does that, because I don't understand it. The > quicwg website doesn't even indicate how to contact the maintainers, so it's > hard to see how it enables a grassroots effort. Indeed, the current quicwg.org has been mostly operated by the chairs, with a small number of contributions from those that might have stumbled on the repo.
Consolidating useful information to a single place would come with improving the documentation on how to contribute, whether it be an issue or a PR to the repo [1]. And of course, we would cover the requisite notes on contribution code of conduct and note well. Cheers Lucas [1] https://github.com/quicwg/quicwg.github.io
