Am 21.10.20 um 22:45 schrieb David Woolley: > One wild thought: is ntpq or one of its DLLs not position independent > code? I could speculate as to why Windows might keep relocated pages > around in case the code is reloaded at the same address before the page > gets reused for other reasons. However, I don't actually know if > Windows does something like that.
That does not jibe with "creeping increase of memory taken". If Win keeps something for reuse ... it should not grow but be reused later again kept for ... :-) Windows has always been a rather buggy and unrealiable OS. Uwe _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
