On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 05:13:55AM -0800, [email protected] wrote: > Hi Michael! > > Do you have a link or could you please write me few lines about the T495 > installation description? > I have stuck in the encryption settings after the GUI installer did not > started. > > Thanks in advance! > > 2019. november 17., vas??rnap 8:37:06 UTC id??pontban Michael Andersson a > k??vetkez??t ??rta: > > > > Yes we are running qubes R4.0.1-RC2 on thinkpad T495 with AMD Ryzen pro > > Needs ???R4.1-testing kernel and xen but otherwise works flawless > > > > L??hetetty Jolla Sailfish -??lypuhelimestani. > > Alkuper??inen viesti > > L??hett??j??: rec wins > > L??hetetty: lauantaina 16. marraskuuta 2019 23.51 > > P????ttymisaika: [email protected] <javascript:> > > Aihe: [qubes-users] Re: 2 new Intel vulnerabilites > > > > On 11/14/19 2:55 AM, Chris Laprise wrote: > > > On 11/14/19 7:28 AM, Andrew David Wong wrote: > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > >> Hash: SHA512 > > >> > > >> On 2019-11-13 12:40 PM, Lorenzo Lamas wrote: > > >>> There are 2 new vulnerabilities in Intel CPU's, also affecting Xen. > > >>> Xen has issued XSA-304(CVE-2018-12207) and XSA 305(CVE-2019-11135). > > >>> Is the Qubes team aware yet? I haven't seen a new QSB. > > >>> > > >> > > >> Yes, we're aware. We're currently in the process of preparing > > >> announcements about these XSAs. > > >> > > >> Typically, XSAs have a predisclosure period, during which the XSA is > > >> embargoed, and the Qubes Security Team has time to analyze it and > > >> prepare patches and an announcement. However, these XSAs had no > > >> embargo period, so the Qubes Security Team had no advance notice of > > >> them before they were publicly announced. > > > > > > The researchers behind these MDS vuln disclosures were being strung > > > along by Intel, who kept changing embargo dates. Eventually they decided > > > to simply publish because the proposed patches from Intel were not > > > addressing a large number of possible attacks. > > > > > > I have summary, links and some advice here: > > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/85c426f7-7e17-b1ab-87c3-71f92d169955%40posteo.net > > > > > > > > > > > In short, Intel have played a monopolist's game and delivered products > > > that match; Its much better (and simpler) for people to move to AMD at > > > least for the time being. It would help if the Qubes community had some > > > clear AMD choices. > > > > > > > so, are there people running Q4.x on AMD machines? if so which ones? > > > >
Hi The convention here is not to top-post. Please scroll to the bottom of the message before you start typing. Or reply inline. It only takes you seconds, and makes it much easier to follow threads. Thanks. unman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/20200203133102.GB8789%40thirdeyesecurity.org.
