On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:52 PM, André Pönitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Should it have n sets of children ('as doubles', 'as floats', 'as short'...) > instead? Then one could expand the interesting ones once and no > extra click needed to switch the type. That's the way of MSVC, and at least it's exhaustive (but they cheat since they alias __m128* to an union), at the price of much screen estate.
> So what would be the preferred display in that case? I don't really know what would be reasonable; i suppose having per 'instance' preference isn't an option :) Hmm. What about the exhaustive children thing + a preferred short display (one of those children) per vector type (as in __m128, __m128i etc)? _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
