Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute).
/s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: >> >> Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this >> mantra indefinitely. ;-) > > I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the > nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's > were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And > we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. > > Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in > contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt > yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't > really a big hassle. > > Kai > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
