This weekend I will try rebuilding everything from scratch (with the suitable backup since I can't afford the downtime :) ). I am thinking that the RELOC stuff might have snuck in during one of the interim 'patches' to the library and might not be needed.
Will post my success after I do the rebuild.
Cheers, jim ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jim Hunkins JDH Software Technologies ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Mar 18, 2004, at 6:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 15/03/04 07:56:22 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By way of a test, I hid the old libc_a and still it all worked. When I ran 'slb -t ram1_lis libc_a', I could find no evidence of your missing name.
Christopher Cave
I looked for RELOC (in case it was STRT not START or some other variant) by using qmon with
������ f 'reloc' <address where I had loaded the various versions of LIBC_A� I was looking at>
There were two RELOCs but not remotely like RELOC_START.
RELOC_START sounds like something a linker needs to do with all C68 programs, since they all have absolute addresses between modules, not PC relative ones.
George
