On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:17:52 +0100
Michal Privoznik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28.02.2012 18:41, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >> Hmm, I know Michal already sent a new version with my suggestions, but
> >> > you're right, splitting out the commands simplified both the responses,
> >> > and makes it easier to discover whether or not that information is
> >> > available, since you can look for the command in guest-info before
> >> > attempting it, rather than attempting it and then looking at the result.
> >> >
> >> > So maybe just something this?:
> >> >
> >> > { 'type': 'GuestNetworkInterface',
> >> > 'data': { 'name': 'str',
> >> > '*hardware-address': 'str',
> >> > '*ip-addresses': ['GuestIpAddress'] } } }
> >> >
> >> > { 'command': 'guest-network-interfaces',
> >> > 'returns': ['GuestNetworkInterface'] }
> > Looks good to me, the only nitpick is that I think command names should be
> > verbs.
>
> guest-get-network-interfaces?
Works for me, but would be good to agree on a standard for it. I'll defer
the decision to Michael, as he's the actual maintainer :)
