On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 04:55:39PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Here we don't expect a failure. In case on failure we'll crash on
s/case on/case of/ > trying to access ['return']. Let's better use .command() that clearly > raise on failure. Maybe: s/Let's better /Better is to/; s/raise/raises/ > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@yandex-team.ru> > --- > scripts/cpu-x86-uarch-abi.py | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. Virtualization: qemu.org | libguestfs.org
