On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:04:29 -0400 Gregory Price <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 02:04:45PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 21:29:14 -0400 > > Gregory Price <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Gregory, > > > > Some comments inline, but I'm happy to add this to my staging tree in the > > meantime > > as it stands (might be a few days until I push a new branch though). > > > > I'm going to do one a quick v3 today with the feedback and some cleanup > in spots i noticed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Junhee Ryu <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Kwangjin Ko <[email protected]> > > > > The SoB chain needs cleaning up. Is this a co-developed situation? > > If it is use the rules in the kernel documentation as I don't think those > > are yet clearly stated in QEMU docs (and they are confusing so I won't try > > to restate them here). > > > > TL;DR: They gave me the command list, I wrote the model. We got > approval to release the model, but I wasn't sure how to capture the > copyright/SoB list. I suppose the copyright covers SKh, but since I > authored the model, it only requires my SoB? Yes - I think only your SoB is fine. Maybe some text to explain the other parts. > > After reading, I'm still not sure how to capture this lol. > > Should I just switch the skh folks to Co-developed-by? > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/vendor/skhynix/meson.build > > > b/hw/cxl/vendor/skhynix/meson.build > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000000..4e57db65f1 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/hw/cxl/vendor/skhynix/meson.build > > > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > > > +system_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_CXL_VENDOR', if_true: > > > files('skhynix_niagara.c',)) > > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/vendor/skhynix/skhynix_niagara.c > > > b/hw/cxl/vendor/skhynix/skhynix_niagara.c > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000000..88e53cc6cc > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/hw/cxl/vendor/skhynix/skhynix_niagara.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,516 @@ > > > +/* > > > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > > + * > > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 MemVerge Inc. > > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 SK hynix Inc. > > > + */ > > > + > > > +#include <sys/shm.h> > > > > This will need some osdep.h magic. There is some there > > already but it will need relaxing (unless you want to run only on sparc ;) > > and we may need to make this device linux host only. > > > > > > Good point, I had not considered osdep issues. Do you know of any > examples of linux-only devices I can use to do a quick patch-up? I > can come back around on this issue later. No idea. > > > > > > + > > > +enum { > > > + NIAGARA_MHD = 0x55, > > > + #define GET_MHD_INFO 0x0 > > > > Is this standard as it's in the normal space? > > If it is then I'd like the implementation pushed down to the > > type3 implementation (with some callbacks or similar.) > > > > :thinking_face: > > maybe a similar pattern to the callback from before? I suppose I could > push this down into type3 and add an mhd callback in the class and have > niagara fill that in with the callback. > > That *feels* right, so i'll go ahead with it. > > > > If I misunderstood anything, let me know > > ~Gregory
