From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
Coverity points out (CID 1508128) a bounds checking error. We need to check
for gsi >= IOAPIC_NUM_PINS, not just greater-than.
Also fix up an assert() that has the same problem, that Coverity didn't see.
Fixes: 4f81baa33ed6 ("hw/xen: Support GSI mapping to PIRQ")
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]>
---
hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c b/hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c
index 3d810dbd59..0e9c108614 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c
@@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ static int allocate_pirq(XenEvtchnState *s, int type, int
gsi)
found:
pirq_inuse_word(s, pirq) |= pirq_inuse_bit(pirq);
if (gsi >= 0) {
- assert(gsi <= IOAPIC_NUM_PINS);
+ assert(gsi < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS);
s->gsi_pirq[gsi] = pirq;
}
s->pirq[pirq].gsi = gsi;
@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ bool xen_evtchn_set_gsi(int gsi, int level)
assert(qemu_mutex_iothread_locked());
- if (!s || gsi < 0 || gsi > IOAPIC_NUM_PINS) {
+ if (!s || gsi < 0 || gsi >= IOAPIC_NUM_PINS) {
return false;
}
--
2.40.1