On 6/7/23 09:54, Konstantin Kostiuk wrote:
Hi Philippe,
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 11:35 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Konstantin,
On 5/7/23 16:12, Konstantin Kostiuk wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Kostiuk <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> ---
> qga/vss-win32/vss-debug.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 qga/vss-win32/vss-debug.h
> +#define PRINT_DEBUG(fmt, ...) {
\
> + char user_sting[512] = { 0 };
\
> + char full_string[640] = { 0 };
\
> + snprintf(user_sting, 512, fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__);
\
> + snprintf(full_string, 640, QGA_PROVIDER_NAME"[%lu]: %s
%s\n", \
> + GetCurrentThreadId(), __func__, user_sting);
\
> + OutputDebugString(full_string);
\
> + fprintf(stderr, "%s", full_string);
\
> +}
Why not simply use a plain function?
I am not sure what you mean.
If you mean to call OutputDebugString directly, then we need to
concatenate the proper string
for each call.
If you mean convert PRINT_DEBUG to function, then we can't use the
__func__ macro in
PRINT_DEBUG to get the real function name. We can convert PRINT_DEBUG to
function
and a new macro that will call PRINT_DEBUG and pass a proper value of
__fucn__.
What solution is better there?
void qga_debug(const char *funcname, const char *fmt, ...);
and g_strdup_vprintf()?
