On Mon, 15 May 2023 03:25:25 -0400
Shaoqin Huang <shahu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Simply fix the #vcpus_count to @vcpus_count in CPUArchId comments.
> Since
> we are at here, resort the parameters in comments to match the sequence
While at it, reorder ...
> of parameters which defined in the CPUArchId.
>
> CC: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahu...@redhat.com>
with commit message fixed up
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/hw/boards.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
> index f4117fdb9a..cefa3d5897 100644
> --- a/include/hw/boards.h
> +++ b/include/hw/boards.h
> @@ -101,10 +101,10 @@ MemoryRegion *machine_consume_memdev(MachineState
> *machine,
> /**
> * CPUArchId:
> * @arch_id - architecture-dependent CPU ID of present or possible CPU
> + * @vcpus_count - number of threads provided by @cpu object
> + * @props - CPU object properties, initialized by board
> * @cpu - pointer to corresponding CPU object if it's present on NULL
> otherwise
> * @type - QOM class name of possible @cpu object
> - * @props - CPU object properties, initialized by board
> - * #vcpus_count - number of threads provided by @cpu object
> */
> typedef struct CPUArchId {
> uint64_t arch_id;
