On 1/6/23 00:24, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 23:55:41 +0200
Robin Voetter <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for taking the time to implement support for Atomic Op completer
support properly :). I have tested out these patches and the kernel
patch, and apart from a minor issue with patch 2 everything works fine;
Yes, Cedric noted the extra semicolon as well, I'm about to post that
patch as non-RFC since it has no dependencies on anything else.
Policy decisions like that are generally left to management tools, so
there would always be a means to enable or disable the feature. In
fact, that's specifically why I test that the Atomic Op completer bits
are unset in the root port before changing them so that this automatic
enablement could live alongside a command line option to statically
enable some bits.
That does however remind me that it is often good with these sorts of
"clever" automatic features to have an opt-out, so I'll likely add an
x-no-rp-atomics device option in the next version to provide that.
I was just going to suggest that, just in case :)
