On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 00:27, Richard Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > While we don't require 16-byte atomicity here, using a single larger > load simplifies the code, and makes it a closer match to STXP. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]> thanks -- PMM
