On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 10:57, Hao Zeng <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 09:52 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Overall, IMHO, we should keep QXL restricted to as few build > > scenarios > > as possible. Given the status of SPICE, possibly we'll even want to > > deprecate it on x86 eventually, not add it to more arches. > > > > What are you seeing as the compelling use case that requires QXL to > > exist on aarch64 ?
> Thank you for your answer, it made me learn a lot. No use case, just > outside customer feedback on the ARM architecture qxl use has problems, > I compiled the community qemu, found that the default does not support > qxl display, so the submitted enablement. > I agree with you, please ignore this commit. I would still like to know why QXL isn't automatically enabled like every other PCI device... -- PMM
