On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:35 PM Ivan Klokov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Since g_new is used to initialize the RISCVAPLICState->state structure,
> in some case we get behavior that is not as expected. This patch
> changes this to g_new0, which allows to initialize the APLIC in the correct
> state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Klokov <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Applied to riscv-to-apply.next
Alistair
> ---
> hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c b/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
> index cfd007e629..71591d44bf 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
> @@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ static void riscv_aplic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
>
> aplic->bitfield_words = (aplic->num_irqs + 31) >> 5;
> aplic->sourcecfg = g_new0(uint32_t, aplic->num_irqs);
> - aplic->state = g_new(uint32_t, aplic->num_irqs);
> + aplic->state = g_new0(uint32_t, aplic->num_irqs);
> aplic->target = g_new0(uint32_t, aplic->num_irqs);
> if (!aplic->msimode) {
> for (i = 0; i < aplic->num_irqs; i++) {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
