On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 09:20, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: > I'm not a fan of 'allow-failure: true' - that basically means nobody will > look at the failing jobs, so we could rather disable the jobs by default > instead (and just run them manually when you want to have a look at them).
Mmm; in fact I think we could probably look at upgrading some of our current 'allow_failure: true' jobs to normal ones -- the cirrus bsd and macos ones seem to pass pretty reliably these days. thanks -- PMM