From: Weiwei Li <[email protected]> Check for Zve32f/Zve64d can overlap check for F/D.
Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> --- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc index 6f7ecf1a68..9b2711b94b 100644 --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc @@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ static bool require_rvf(DisasContext *s) switch (s->sew) { case MO_16: case MO_32: - return has_ext(s, RVF); + return s->cfg_ptr->ext_zve32f; case MO_64: - return has_ext(s, RVD); + return s->cfg_ptr->ext_zve64d; default: return false; } @@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ static bool require_scale_rvf(DisasContext *s) switch (s->sew) { case MO_8: case MO_16: - return has_ext(s, RVF); + return s->cfg_ptr->ext_zve32f; case MO_32: - return has_ext(s, RVD); + return s->cfg_ptr->ext_zve64d; default: return false; } -- 2.39.2
