On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 15:56, Richard Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 9/27/22 05:00, Jerome Forissier wrote: > > SP_EL1 must be kept when EL3 is present but EL2 is not. Therefore mark > > it with ARM_CP_EL3_NO_EL2_KEEP. > > > > Fixes: 696ba3771894 ("target/arm: Handle cpreg registration for missing EL") > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> > > This certainly looks right, as how else would EL3 set up EL1 as desired. I > suppose this > error comes from a slight mis-read of R_RJFFP, in that SP_EL1 may be > considered > "associated" with EL1 and not EL[23].
Oops. Applied to target-arm.next, and Cc: [email protected] since this bug made it into 7.1 :-( thanks -- PMM
