On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Alon Levy <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:00:18AM +0000, Alon Levy wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:42:29PM +0800, ZhouPeng wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Alon Levy <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:13:50AM +0800, ZhouPeng wrote:
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> I meet the err:
>> > >>
>> > >> # virsh dumpxml 63
>> > >> error: internal error cannot parse json {"timestamp": {"seconds":
>> > >> 1323332828, "microseco{"timest35p":39}, "econds":PICE_D 1CO3233TE828,
>> > >> Dmicrosec "ds"data"52}, : {"ser: "SPrCE_DIS"ONNEC{ED", "port": {"serve
>> > >> ": {6299": "62, "famiamily": "ipv:", "hist": pv4"1 "hos6":
>> > >> "182.168.12.231"}, "2lient.: {"p2rt": 3350196, "fa"ily": "}, "cl,
>> > >> "ho{sport":t"35020", ": "19y": "i2.4", "168.1.": "19}: lexical error:
>> > >> invalid string in json text.
>> > >> ds": 1323332828, "microseco{"timest35p":39}, "econds":PICE_D
>> > >>
>> > >> This similar bug seems has been reported by:
>> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744105
>> > >>
>> > >> The patch(http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/qemu/commit/?h=spice.v42)
>> > >> seems be related with the competition.
>> > >> But I searched the upstream qemu, it has not been merged in.
>> > >>
>> > >> My qemu is qemu-kvm-0.15.1 on 3.1.2-1.fc16.x86_64
>> > >>
>> > >> Is there any plan about this bug, it seems be some serious.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > The patch Daniel Berrange mentioned wotrked around it in qemu and is in
>> > > qemu 1.0-rc0 and onward, still checking qemu-kvm. There is another patch
>> >
>> > Yea, I searched in spice-core.c again and the patch is in qemu unstable
>> > Sorry, I carelessly search by " me " but not " me;" before.
>>
>> It is in qemu-kvm-1.0 as well. But like you said fedora carries 0.15.1
>> that doesn't have it.
>>
>> > > in spice-0.10 and in 0.8, still need to check if it's in fedora. Which
>> > > version of spice are you using?
>> >
>> > spice-server.x86_64 version 0.9.1
>>
>> which doesn't have the spice side fix. but 0.10.0 has it, and it is
>> closest to 0.9.1. I assume this is from the fedora package as well since
>> you mentioned qemu-kvm is from a fedora package? seems the latest is
>> indeed 0.9.1-1, can you test
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=273917
>> (spice-server-0.10.0-1)?
>>
>
> If you find it fixes your problem and doesn't introduce any new ones
> please +1 spice-0.10.0-1.fc16 at
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spice-0.10.0-1.fc16
After the steps below, I am sure it is spice-server-0.10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 works.
[root@localhost pkgconfig]# ldd /usr/bin/qemu-kvm
libspice-server.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libspice-server.so.1
(0x00007f5f02799000)
[root@localhost ~]# rpm --erase spice-server-0.9.1-1.fc16.x86_64 --nodeps
[root@localhost ~]# rpm --erase spice-server-0.10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 --nodeps
[root@localhost ~]# ls /usr/lib64/libspice-server* -l
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 24 Dec 20 06:43 /usr/lib64/libspice-server.so
-> libspice-server.so.1.0.2
[root@localhost ~]# virsh restore 43.ckp
error: Failed to restore domain from 43.ckp
error: internal error Child process (LC_ALL=C
PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin /usr/bin/qemu-kvm -help) status
unexpected: exit status 127
//Note: libspice-server.so.1.0.2 doesn't exists
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -i spice-server-0.10.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm
[root@localhost ~]# ls /usr/lib64/libspice-server* -l
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 24 Dec 20 06:43
/usr/lib64/libspice-server.so -> libspice-server.so.1.0.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Dec 22 07:21
/usr/lib64/libspice-server.so.1 -> libspice-server.so.1.0.2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 983600 Nov 14 08:08 /usr/lib64/libspice-server.so.1.0.2
[root@localhost ~]# virsh restore 43.ckp
Domain restored from 43.ckp
----
The software suits related:
spice-server x86_64
0.10.0-1.fc16 installed 993
k
qemu-kvm x86_64
2:0.15.1-3.fc16 @updates 0.0
qemu-system-x86 x86_64
2:0.15.1-3.fc16 @updates 12 M
spice-server-devel x86_64
0.9.1-1.fc16 @fedora 19 k
This random bug appears at least 2 time one day before fixing.
So in the coming 2 days, if this bug does't appear again, I will
assume spice-server-0.10.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm fix it :)
> Thanks,
> Alon
>> >
>> > Thanks Alon,
>> > --
>> > Zhou Peng
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spice-devel mailing list
>> spice-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
--
Zhou Peng
