在 2022/8/3 01:57, Eugenio Pérez 写道:
Since we're going to allow SVQ to add elements without the guest's knowledge and without its own VirtQueueElement, it's easier to check if an element is a valid head checking a different thing than the VirtQueueElement. Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <[email protected]> ---
Patch looks good to me. But I spot several other issues: 1) vhost_svq_add() use size_t for in_num and out_num, is this intended? 2) do we need to fail vhost_svq_add() if in_num + out_num == 0? Thanks
hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c index ffd2b2c972..e6eebd0e8d 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static VirtQueueElement *vhost_svq_get_buf(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq, return NULL; }- if (unlikely(!svq->desc_state[used_elem.id].elem)) {+ if (unlikely(!svq->desc_state[used_elem.id].ndescs)) { qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "Device %s says index %u is used, but it was not available", svq->vdev->name, used_elem.id); @@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ static VirtQueueElement *vhost_svq_get_buf(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq, }num = svq->desc_state[used_elem.id].ndescs;+ svq->desc_state[used_elem.id].ndescs = 0; last_used_chain = vhost_svq_last_desc_of_chain(svq, num, used_elem.id); svq->desc_next[last_used_chain] = svq->free_head; svq->free_head = used_elem.id;
