On 12/16/2011 04:17 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 12/16/2011 10:42 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Applied.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
So you pushed this with qdev_property_add_child() calls spread all over
the place instead of being treated like other properties?:-(
I think actually this is not the biggest problem. child properties are dynamic,
and it's not a problem IMO if they are created like that.
I don't like that _link_ properties are spread all over the place instead of
being treated like other properties. Link properties are static, and PROP_PTR
properties could often be converted to links.
With your new series, we should be able to add a DEFINE_PROP_LINK() that does
the right thing I guess. I've got no objection to that.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
I'm playing with separating the "legacy" and "static" property concepts so that
we can head in that direction. I hope to send out an RFC in an hour or so.
Paolo
