On 4/21/22 12:03, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 at 19:02, Richard Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:Use tcg_constant_{i32,i64} as appropriate throughout. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> --- target/arm/translate-m-nocp.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/arm/translate-m-nocp.c b/target/arm/translate-m-nocp.c index d9e144e8eb..27363a7b4e 100644 --- a/target/arm/translate-m-nocp.c +++ b/target/arm/translate-m-nocp.c @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static bool trans_VSCCLRM(DisasContext *s, arg_VSCCLRM *a) } /* Zero the Sregs from btmreg to topreg inclusive. */ - zero = tcg_const_i64(0); + zero = tcg_constant_i64(0); if (btmreg & 1) { write_neon_element64(zero, btmreg >> 1, 1, MO_32); btmreg++;Looks like we were previously leaking the TCGv for this one?
Yes. I'll update the commit message to mention that. r~
