Hi

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 6:37 PM Thomas Huth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 20/04/2022 16.10, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 05:26:00PM +0400, [email protected] wrote:
> >> From: Marc-André Lureau <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> According to our configure checks, this is the list of supported
> >> compilers.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <[email protected]>
> >> Reviewed-by: Damien Hedde <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>   docs/about/build-platforms.rst | 10 ++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/docs/about/build-platforms.rst 
> >> b/docs/about/build-platforms.rst
> >> index c29a4b8fe649..1980c5d2476f 100644
> >> --- a/docs/about/build-platforms.rst
> >> +++ b/docs/about/build-platforms.rst
> >> @@ -92,6 +92,16 @@ hosted on Linux (Debian/Fedora).
> >>   The version of the Windows API that's currently targeted is Vista / 
> >> Server
> >>   2008.
> >>
> >> +Supported compilers
> >> +-------------------
> >> +
> >> +To compile, QEMU requires either:
> >> +
> >> +- GCC >= 7.4.0
> >> +- Clang >= 6.0
> >> +- XCode Clang >= 10.0
> >
> > Do we need to spell out the versions explicitly ? These versions are
> > all derived from what's available in the repos of the supported build
> > platforms, similar to any other build deps we have. I don't think we
> > want to start a precedent of duplicating versions in this doc for
> > build deps we have, and there's nothing particularly special about
> > compilers in this respect.
>
> I agree with Daniel - when I saw this patch, the first thought that I had
> was: "This will be getting out of sync quickly" ...

I don't have the impression we bump our compiler requirement regularly
or lightly.

> so I'd also recommend to rather not add this here.

Outdated documentation is still better than no documentation. YMMV.


Reply via email to