Thanks for noticing the problem. I've done that.

Sam

Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> 于2022年4月19日周二 06:24写道:

> On 2022/04/18 18:05, Sam Li wrote:
> > fix code style issue.
>
> This patch must be squashed into the previous one.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Li <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  block/io_uring.c | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/io_uring.c b/block/io_uring.c
> > index 2942967126..57745ecfa1 100644
> > --- a/block/io_uring.c
> > +++ b/block/io_uring.c
> > @@ -436,10 +436,15 @@ LuringState *luring_init(Error **errp)
> >
> >      ioq_init(&s->io_q);
> >      if (io_uring_register_ring_fd(&s->ring) < 0) {
> > -        error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "failed to register linux
> io_uring ring file descriptor");
> > +        /*
> > +         * If the function fails, it will fallback to the non-optimized
> io_uring
> > +         * operations.
> > +         */
>
> The comment wording is a little odd: given that the comment is inside the
> "if",
> meaning that we are in the case "the function failed", saying "if the
> function
> fails..." is strange. You could simply state something like:
>
>         /*
>          * Only warn about this error: we will fall back to the
> non-optimized
>          * io_uring operations.
>          */
>
> > +        error_setg_errno(errp, errno,
> > +                         "failed to register linux io_uring ring file
> descriptor");
> >      }
> > -    return s;
> >
> > +    return s;
> >  }
> >
> >  void luring_cleanup(LuringState *s)
>
>
> --
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research

Reply via email to