On 4/1/22 12:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
The types are compatible, but it's weird that the compiler doesn't warn that the prototype and definition are different types: it seems like the kind of "technically valid but usually a bug" that a warning would be nice for.
Good point. Submitted https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105131 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54706 r~
