On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 09:43:23AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 1/18/22 15:47, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > and what exactly this CPU ID is, > > may QOM path pointing to VCPU instance would be better? > > For x86 it would be the APIC ID but yes, having a QOM path is more future > proof. Thanks Igor for noting this.
Whatever format we use to describe a CPU in the results, should be the same as the format uses in the input parameters. I had suggested using a bitmap of CPU IDs, but if we're going to use QOM paths for results, we must use QOM paths to select CPUs too. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
