> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alistair Francis [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 7:10 AM
> To: Jiangyifei <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected] Developers <[email protected]>; open
> list:RISC-V <[email protected]>; [email protected]; open
> list:Overall <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Anup Patel
> <[email protected]>; Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>; Alistair
> Francis <[email protected]>; Bin Meng <[email protected]>;
> Fanliang (EulerOS) <[email protected]>; Wubin (H)
> <[email protected]>; Wanghaibin (D) <[email protected]>;
> wanbo (G) <[email protected]>; limingwang (A)
> <[email protected]>; Anup Patel <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/12] target/riscv: Add target/riscv/kvm.c to place 
> the
> public kvm interface
> 
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:48 AM Yifei Jiang via <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Add target/riscv/kvm.c to place kvm_arch_* function needed by
> > kvm/kvm-all.c. Meanwhile, add kvm support in meson.build file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yifei Jiang <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Mingwang Li <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  meson.build              |   2 +
> >  target/riscv/kvm.c       | 133
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  target/riscv/meson.build |   1 +
> >  3 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 target/riscv/kvm.c
> >
> > diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build index 53065e96ec..7eaec31a3a
> > 100644
> > --- a/meson.build
> > +++ b/meson.build
> > @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ elif cpu in ['ppc', 'ppc64']
> >    kvm_targets = ['ppc-softmmu', 'ppc64-softmmu']  elif cpu in
> > ['mips', 'mips64']
> >    kvm_targets = ['mips-softmmu', 'mipsel-softmmu', 'mips64-softmmu',
> > 'mips64el-softmmu']
> > +elif cpu in ['riscv']
> > +  kvm_targets = ['riscv32-softmmu', 'riscv64-softmmu']
> >  else
> >    kvm_targets = []
> >  endif
> 
> Can you add this as a separate commit at the end of the series?
> 
> That way we have implemented KVM support before we enable it for users.
> 
> Alistair

Yes, that makes sense.

Yifei

Reply via email to