No one objected, so I think we can go for the 11th. On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 12:21:56PM +0100, Mark Burton wrote: > Can we confirm the 11th for this meeting? > > Cheers > Mark. > > > > On 4 Jan 2022, at 10:29, Edgar E. Iglesias <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:49 PM Markus Armbruster <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > writes: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:37:43PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > >> Mark Burton <[email protected] > > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> writes: > > >> > > >> > I realise it’s very short notice, but what about having a discussion > > >> > today at 15:00 ? > > >> > > >> I have a conflict today. I could try to reschedule, but I'd prefer to > > >> talk next week instead. Less stress, better prep. > > > > > > I fear we've run out of time for this year if we want all interested > > > parties to be able to attend. I'll be off on PTO from end of this > > > week until the new year, and I know alot of folk are doing similar. > > > > Right. I'll be off from Dec 23 to Jan 9. Can we all make Jan 11? > > > > Jan 11th works for me! > > > > Thanks, > > Edgar >
Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
