Hi Philippe,
On 2021/11/15 22:58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Keep the common TYPE_MACHINE class initialization in
machine_base_class_init(), make it abstract, and move
the non-common code to a new class: "smp-without-dies-valid".
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]>
---
tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
index dfe7f1313b0..90a249fe8c8 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
@@ -478,13 +478,19 @@ static void machine_base_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void
*data)
{
MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
+ mc->smp_props.prefer_sockets = true;
+
+ mc->name = g_strdup(SMP_MACHINE_NAME);
+}
+
+static void machine_without_dies_valid_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
+{
+ MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
+
mc->min_cpus = MIN_CPUS;
mc->max_cpus = MAX_CPUS;
- mc->smp_props.prefer_sockets = true;
mc->smp_props.dies_supported = false;
-
- mc->name = g_strdup(SMP_MACHINE_NAME);
}
static void machine_without_dies_invalid_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
@@ -606,9 +612,14 @@ static const TypeInfo smp_machine_types[] = {
{
.name = TYPE_MACHINE,
.parent = TYPE_OBJECT,
+ .abstract = true,
.class_init = machine_base_class_init,
.class_size = sizeof(MachineClass),
.instance_size = sizeof(MachineState),
+ }, {
+ .name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-without-dies-valid"),
+ .parent = TYPE_MACHINE,
+ .class_init = machine_without_dies_valid_class_init,
}, {
.name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-without-dies-invalid"),
.parent = TYPE_MACHINE,
@@ -629,7 +640,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/generic/valid",
- TYPE_MACHINE,
+ MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-without-dies-valid"),
test_generic_valid);
g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/generic/invalid",
MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-without-dies-invalid"),
After patch #7 and #8, we will have sub-tests as below. It looks nice,
but it will
probably be better to tweak "smp-without-dies-valid" to "smp-generic-valid",
and "smp-without-dies-invalid" to "smp-generic-invalid", which will be more
consistent with the corresponding sub-test name.
It's Ok now as we only have dies currently besides generic
sockets/cores/threads,
but "smp-without-dies-xxx" will become a bit confusing when new topology
members are introduced and tested here.
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
module_call_init(MODULE_INIT_QOM);
g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/generic/valid",
MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-without-dies-valid"),
test_generic_valid);
g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/generic/invalid",
MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-without-dies-invalid"),
test_generic_invalid);
g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/with_dies",
MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-dies"),
test_with_dies);
g_test_run();
return 0;
}
Otherwise, #7 and #8 look nice. Thanks for your work!
Thanks,
Yanan