On 10/27/21 21:06, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/27/21 11:07 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> +    uint64_t eval_big = dup_const(df, 0x80);
>>       TCGv_i64 t0 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>>       TCGv_i64 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>> -    switch (df) {
>> -    case DF_BYTE:
>> -        eval_zero_or_big = 0x0101010101010101ULL;
>> -        eval_big = 0x8080808080808080ULL;
>> -        break;
>> -    case DF_HALF:
>> -        eval_zero_or_big = 0x0001000100010001ULL;
>> -        eval_big = 0x8000800080008000ULL;
>> -        break;
>> -    case DF_WORD:
>> -        eval_zero_or_big = 0x0000000100000001ULL;
>> -        eval_big = 0x8000000080000000ULL;
>> -        break;
>> -    case DF_DOUBLE:
>> -        eval_zero_or_big = 0x0000000000000001ULL;
>> -        eval_big = 0x8000000000000000ULL;
> 
> The conversion is incorrect for eval_big.
> The conversion creates e.g.
> 
>     0x0080 0080 0080 0080
> not
>     0x8000 8000 8000 8000

Oops...

> You'd have to do something like
> 
>     uint64_t eval_one = dup_const(df, 1);
>     uint64_t eval_big = eval_one << ((8 << df) - 1);

Nice :)

Reply via email to