On 10/27/21 07:55, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 07:41:41AM -0400, Jonah Palmer wrote:
This series introduces new QMP/HMP commands to dump the status of a
virtio device at different levels.

[Jonah: Rebasing previous patchset from Oct. 5 (v7). Original patches
  are from Laurent Vivier from May 2020.

  Rebase from v7 to v8 includes an additional assert to make sure
  we're not returning NULL in virtio_id_to_name(). Rebase also
  includes minor additions/edits to qapi/virtio.json.]

1. Main command

HMP Only:

     virtio [subcommand]

     Example:

         List all sub-commands:

         (qemu) virtio
         virtio query  -- List all available virtio devices
         virtio status path -- Display status of a given virtio device
         virtio queue-status path queue -- Display status of a given virtio 
queue
         virtio vhost-queue-status path queue -- Display status of a given 
vhost queue
         virtio queue-element path queue [index] -- Display element of a given 
virtio queue
I don't see a compelling reason why these are setup as sub-commands
under a new "virtio" top level. This HMP approach and the QMP 'x-debug-query'
naming just feels needlessly different from the current QEMU practices.

IMHO they should just be "info" subcommands for HMP. ie

          info virtio  -- List all available virtio devices
          info virtio-status path -- Display status of a given virtio device
          info virtio-queue-status path queue -- Display status of a given 
virtio queue
          info virtio-vhost-queue-status path queue -- Display status of a 
given vhost queue
          info virtio-queue-element path queue [index] -- Display element of a 
given virtio queue

While the corresponding QMP commands ought to be

          x-query-virtio
          x-query-virtio-status
          x-query-virtio-queue-status
          x-query-virtio-vhost-queue-status
          x-query-virtio-queue-element


Regards,
Daniel

Sure, I don't mind changing it to this if this is what others would prefer.
If there aren't any objections, I'll switch it to this in the next revision.

Jonah

Reply via email to