Hi On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 7:11 AM David Gibson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:11:17AM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:00 AM Peter Maydell <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 at 20:55, Marc-André Lureau > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > fdt_check_full was added in 1.4.7: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dtc/dtc.git/tag/?h=v1.4.7 > > > > > > > > Only ubuntu appears to be lagging a bit behind. I wonder if they > would > > > consider an update. > > > > > > I doubt it. You would need to wait until that actually falls off > > > our supported list. You also have a couple of years to wait until > > > Debian oldstable is no longer on our supported list. > > > > > > Maybe, I don't know why debian oldstable would have received a new > version > > plus fixes, and not ubuntu. > > > > It seems we could have our own fallback copy of fdt_check_full() though.. > > I'll give that a try. > > We could, but fdt_check_full() is actually a pretty complex function. > > Yeah, that would be used for those who don't have >= 1.4.7. Alternatively we could lower the fdt_check_full to fdt_check_header in this case? It seems it is used to verify the DT from SLOF. It may be trusted I suppose, or a malformed DT may only impact the guest? > -- > David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code > david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ > _other_ > | _way_ _around_! > http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson > -- Marc-André Lureau
