On 6/13/21 12:32 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > I've renamed arch:* to target:* as there was some amount of confusion as > to what "arch" really meant without context.
There was a discussion with jsnow about that on IRC, and IIRC he said what first matters to have easy tags so the reporter does the first triage directly. > I've removed labels for > lm32 and unicore32 which have been removed from qemu 6.1. I've added a > label for hexagon. > > I have not yet added labels for host architecture, because I couldn't > figure out how best to word the description, or even if all of the > target:* labels need re-wording to emphasize target. We want to have a first label to quicker triage. Once a maintainer is notified, different/finest triage can be done. The downside is this is noisier for maintainers :( Wait, are you seeing labels are a notification mechanism or a way to sort the issues? Until your rename I was using arch:s390x to contact S390 maintainers for build failure on s390x host [Build System, arch: s390x], bug in TCG backend or bug in TCG frontend for target [accel: TCG, arch: s390x], hoping at least one person notified would have further look. > > And then there's the special case of TCI. For reporters TCI != TCG, so the simplest is "accel: TCI", but I prefer "accel:TCG:TCI".
