On 16.04.2021 02:50, Peter Xu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:32:13PM +0300, Andrey Gruzdev wrote:
This series is a kind of PoC for asynchronous snapshot reverting. This is
about external snapshots only and doesn't involve block devices. Thus, it's
mainly intended to be used with the new 'background-snapshot' migration
capability and otherwise standard QEMU migration mechanism.
The major ideas behind this first version were:
* Make it compatible with 'exec:'-style migration - options can be create
some separate tool or integrate into qemu-system.
* Support asynchronous revert stage by using unaltered postcopy logic
at destination. To do this, we should be capable of saving RAM pages
so that any particular page can be directly addressed by it's block ID
and page offset. Possible solutions here seem to be:
use separate index (and storing it somewhere)
create sparse file on host FS and address pages with file offset
use QCOW2 (or other) image container with inherent sparsity support
* Make snapshot image file dense on the host FS so we don't depend on
copy/backup tools and how they deal with sparse files. Off course,
there's some performance cost for this choice.
* Make the code which is parsing unstructered format of migration stream,
at least, not very sophisticated. Also, try to have minimum dependencies
on QEMU migration code, both RAM and device.
* Try to keep page save latencies small while not degrading migration
bandwidth too much.
For this first version I decided not to integrate into main QEMU code but
create a separate tool. The main reason is that there's not too much migration
code that is target-specific and can be used in it's unmodified form. Also,
it's still not very clear how to make 'qemu-system' integration in terms of
command-line (or monitor/QMP?) interface extension.
For the storage format, QCOW2 as a container and large (1MB) cluster size seem
to be an optimal choice. Larger cluster is beneficial for performance
particularly
in the case when image preallocation is disabled. Such cluster size does not
result
in too high internal fragmentation level (~10% of space waste in most cases) yet
allows to reduce significantly the number of expensive cluster allocations.
A bit tricky part is dispatching QEMU migration stream cause it is mostly
unstructered and depends on configuration parameters like 'send-configuration'
and 'send-section-footer'. But, for the case with default values in migration
globals it seems that implemented dispatching code works well and won't have
compatibility issues in a reasonably long time frame.
I decided to keep RAM save path synchronous, anyhow it's better to use writeback
cache mode for the live snapshots cause of it's interleaving page address
pattern.
Page coalescing buffer is used to merge contiguous pages to optimize block layer
writes.
Since for snapshot loading opening image file in cached mode would not do any
good,
it implies that Linux native AIO and O_DIRECT mode is used in a common scenario.
AIO support in RAM loading path is implemented by using a ring of preallocated
fixed-sized buffers in such a way that there's always a number of outstanding
block
requests anytime. It also ensures in-order request completion.
How to use:
**Save:**
* qemu> migrate_set_capability background-snapshot on
* qemu> migrate "exec:<qemu-bin-path>/qemu-snap -s <virtual-size>
--cache=writeback --aio=threads save <image-file.qcow2>"
**Load:**
* Use 'qemu-system-* -incoming defer'
* qemu> migrate_incoming "exec:<qemu-bin-path>/qemu-snap
--cache=none --aio=native load <image-file.qcow2>"
**Load with postcopy:**
* Use 'qemu-system-* -incoming defer'
* qemu> migrate_set_capability postcopy-ram on
* qemu> migrate_incoming "exec:<qemu-bin-path>/qemu-snap --postcopy=60
--cache=none --aio=native load <image-file.qcow2>"
And yes, asynchronous revert works well only with SSD, not with rotational
disk..
Some performance stats:
* SATA SSD drive with ~500/450 MB/s sequantial read/write and ~60K IOPS max.
* 220 MB/s average save rate (depends on workload)
* 440 MB/s average load rate in precopy
* 260 MB/s average load rate in postcopy
Andrey,
Before I try to read it (since I'm probably not the best person to review
it..).. Would you remind me on the major difference of external snapshots
comparing to the existing one, and problems to solve?
Thanks,
Hi Peter,
For the external snapshots - the difference (compared to internal) is that
snapshot
data is going to storage objects which are not part VM config. I mean that for
internal
snapshots we use configured storage of the VM instance to store both vm state
and blockdev
snapshot data. The opposite is for external snapshots when we save vmstate and
blockdev
snapshots to separate files on the host. Also external snapshots are not
managed by QEMU.
One of the problems is that the vmstate part of external snapshot is
essentially the
migration stream which is schema-less and it's structure is dependent on QEMU
target.
That means that currently we can do a revert-to-snapshot operation with the
sequence of
QMP commands but we can do that only in a synchronous way, i.e. vcpus can't be
started
until all of the vmstate data has been transferred. The reason for this
synchronous
behavior is that we cannot locate arbitrary RAM page in raw migration stream if
we start
vcpus early and get faults for the pages that are missing on destination vm.
So the major goal of this PoC is to demonstrate asynchronous snapshot reverting
in QEMU
while keeping migration code mostly unchanged. To do that we need to split
migration stream
into two parts, particularly these parts are RAM pages and the rest of vmstate.
And then,
if we can do this, RAM pages can be dispatched directly to a block device with
block offsets
deduced from page GPAs.
--
Andrey Gruzdev, Principal Engineer
Virtuozzo GmbH +7-903-247-6397
virtuzzo.com
