On 03/17/21 17:24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 3/17/21 4:59 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> If this is about an "IO Bus" or "IO instructions", then we should call >> the macro TARGET_HAS_IO_BUS or "TARGET_ISA_HAS_IO" (or >> "TARGET_HAS_IO_INSNS"), or something like those. My only confusion was >> about the "IO Port" expression in the macro name; the idea is OK from my >> perspective otherwise. > > TARGET_HAS_IO_BUS / TARGET_HAS_IO_INSNS LGTM > (ISA bus is not particularly relevant for the AVR target). Apologies for being unclear -- by "ISA", I meant "instruction set architecture". So "TARGET_ISA_HAS_IO" was a synonym for "TARGET_HAS_IO_INSNS" -- i.e., no IO-specific machine code instructions. > Thanks for the feedback :) My pleasure :) Laszlo
