On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 05:23:24AM +0200, Mahmoud Mandour wrote:
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static struct fuse_req *fuse_ll_alloc_req(struct
> fuse_session *se)
> {
> struct fuse_req *req;
>
> - req = (struct fuse_req *)calloc(1, sizeof(struct fuse_req));
> + req = g_try_new(struct fuse_req, 1);g_try_new0() since the original call was calloc(3)? > @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static int lo_map_grow(struct lo_map *map, size_t > new_nelems) > return 1; > } > > - new_elems = realloc(map->elems, sizeof(map->elems[0]) * new_nelems); > + new_elems = g_realloc_n(map->elems, new_nelems, sizeof(map->elems[0])); g_try_realloc_n() since failure is handled below? Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
