Oh, I understand what you mean, and will change it in V3. Thanks, Lei.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 6:23 PM To: Rao, Lei <[email protected]>; Zhang, Chen <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] Optimize the function of packet_new > + offset = colo_bitmap_find_dirty(ram_state, block, offset, > + &num); IIUC, this return value would pass to the next round as start index, so you should skip the already checked one. Thanks On 3/12/21 5:56 PM, Rao, Lei wrote: > How about redefine a function named packet_new_nocopy? > In comments, we can tell the caller don't release the buffer and the > packet_destroy will release it. > > Thanks, > Lei. > -----Original Message----- > From:[email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 2:53 PM > To: Rao, Lei<[email protected]>; Zhang, > Chen<[email protected]>;[email protected];[email protected];dgi > [email protected];[email protected];[email protected] > Cc:[email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] Optimize the function of packet_new > >
